Tesla Model X

为many years, theelectric carhas been the face of eco-friendly alternative energy. The cars operate on rechargeable batteries as opposed to gasoline, and are thus perceived as an ideal way of going green, since they do not depletefossil fuelsor release emissions harmful to the environment. Recently, however, the electric car has been the subject of scrutiny, with some critics claiming that these vehicles are not, in fact, as eco-friendly as the purport to be.

Cause for Concern

Electric cars have come under fire for two main reasons. First of all, some critics are concerned that the batteries used to power the cars are not produced in an environmentally friendly fashion. Secondly, some have pointed out the electricity that is used to charge the car battery is not generated viagreen technology. Both concerns suggest that while there might be some environmental benefits gained from eliminating the use of gasoline, these pros are cancelled out by the irresponsible ways they are manufactured.

Norwegian Study

The study that has brought the most publicity to this issue, and which has provided the best support for these criticisms, was conducted at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Researchers at the university studied the overall impact of the electric car on the environment, and determined that ultimately, the production of these vehicles is just as harmful to the environment as that of a regular car. In fact, some evidence from the study suggests that electric cars may even have a greater negative impact than a more “traditional” car.

Related: Celebrities Going Green: Tom Hanks & his eBox Electric Car

The Reasoning

The main evidence for these findings lies with the materials used to manufacture the vehicle. Researchers point out that purchasing a used vehicle would be a more environmentally responsible choice than purchasing a brand new electric car, which requires energy and raw material to build. They are particularly concerned about the ways that the batteries are both produced and disposed of, which they argue does more harm than good. Analysts involved in the study also noted that the electricity used to power the cars is typically produced by coal, a factor that seems to undermine the claim that electric cars eliminate the need for fossil fuels.

The Response

Experts both within and outside of the electric vehicle industry, however, have been quick to denounce the claims put forth by the Norwegian study. These individuals concede that the production of any vehicle will require the use of energy, but also note that the long-term benefits of electric cars outweigh the environmental costs levied during their production. They also note that when charged from an electric grid, these cars are infinitely more environmentally responsible even than hybrid vehicles.

根据最近的研究,总体结论eems to be that electric cars are eco-friendly—but perhaps not as eco-friendly as the marketing would suggest. Ultimately, the individual who purchases and drives an electric car must also do his or her part to ensure that the electricity used to charge the car battery comes from a sustainable source, so as not to negate the positive effects of the vehicle.

Greener Ideal strives to help you live your life in more sustainable ways with green living tips, healthy recipes and commentary on the latest environment news. The views expressed by guest authors are their own and may not reflect those of Greener Ideal.

3 COMMENTS

  1. Are electric cars really eco friendl?

    The post is great in addition the articles which titled by a question are promising often

    “Electric cars have come under fire for two main reasons. First of all, some critics are concerned that the batteries used to power the cars are not produced in an environmentally friendly fashion. Secondly, some have pointed out the electricity that is used to charge the car battery is not generated via green technology”

    the first reason sound logical and I always see Batteries and fossil fuel as two faces of one coin “Energy Dependency”, both are strong bad friends their superiority come from their magical power to store energy and tell now the problem “the storage problem ” have to be solved if we want go green more efficiently

    the second reason” the source of charging energy” is not a big issue, In Site Recharging stations powered by RE is a visible choice, and it is the future for electric car

    this will minimize the negative impacts of using Batteries, which should be used for a specific transition period to be able to solve the storage problem

    but still we have to think out of the box when designing the green car from power transmition to car suspending ,from using tires to use ski for example and more

  2. Modern electric cars are a new technology. Considering the few made and sold, their ecological consequences matter little. However, as the technology improves and as electricity is generated from cleaner sources, electric cars will most likely become much more ecologically benign than fuel-burning cars.

    If we attempted to delay the production of electric cars until they became more ecologically benign, the consequences would most likely be negative because development of the technology would be halted.

  3. The Norwegian study is indefensible. Buried in their assumptions are things like a 74 kg controller (the one in my car weighs 6.4 kg) and an 80 kg battery cooling system containing 60 kgs of aluminium (my whole battery back weighs 118 kgs and the batteries are lithium iron phosphate so the car does not have a battery cooling system.

    Blithering oil company apologists

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here